<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digitally Approved &#187; media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitallyapproved.com/tag/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitallyapproved.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interactive Marketing to Hit $55B in Five Years</title>
		<link>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/07/09/interactive-marketing-to-hit-55b-in-five-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/07/09/interactive-marketing-to-hit-55b-in-five-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>My-lan Beauford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[By The Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitallyapproved.com/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Industry News via DM News&#8230;. Interactive marketing will hit $55 billion and represent 21% of all marketing spending by 2014, as marketers continue to shift dollars from away from traditional media and toward search marketing, display advertising, e-mail marketing, social media and mobile marketing, according to Forrester Research. In the US Interactive Marketing Forecast, 2009 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-641" title="a-million-dollars" src="http://www.digitallyapproved.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/a-million-dollars-300x251.jpg" alt="a-million-dollars" width="300" height="251" /></p>
<p>Industry News via <a href="http://www.dmnews.com/">DM News</a>&#8230;.</p>
<p>Interactive marketing will hit $55 billion and represent 21% of all marketing spending by 2014, as marketers continue to shift dollars from away from traditional media and toward search marketing, display advertising, e-mail marketing, social media and mobile marketing, according to Forrester Research.</p>
<p><span id="more-640"></span></p>
<p>In the US Interactive Marketing Forecast, 2009 to 2014, released July 8, Forrester found that marketers faced with budget cuts and the need for immediate sales in recessionary times turn towards interactive tools that are less expensive, more measurable, and better for direct response than traditional media.</p>
<p>“In today&#8217;s economic climate, marketers are shifting dollars downstream, so they are much more focused on tools that drive immediate response and sales,” said report author Shar VanBoskirk, VP and principal analyst at<br />
Forrester.</p>
<p>Sixty percent of marketers surveyed indicated they would increase budget for interactive by shifting money away from traditional marketing. Unfortunately for direct marketers, the direct mail budget was cited more than any other traditional medium as the place to cut.</p>
<p>To read the rest of the article click <a href="http://www.dmnews.com/Interactive-marketing-to-hit-55B-in-five-years/article/139746/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/07/09/interactive-marketing-to-hit-55b-in-five-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson Death Completely Overwhelms Media</title>
		<link>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/07/06/michael-jackson-death-completely-overwhelms-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/07/06/michael-jackson-death-completely-overwhelms-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christy Wise</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Power Of Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BitTorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitallyapproved.com/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The breaking news of Michael Jackson’s sudden death nearly two weeks ago dramatically slowed the internet, crippled Google, crashed Twitter, sent iTunes and BitTorrent downloads skyrocketing and made for a huge portion of TV news and radio airplay, according to The Nielsen Company, Billboard and a number of other analysts that tracked coverage of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-634" title="art_jackson_fail_whale_raul_orozco" src="http://www.digitallyapproved.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/art_jackson_fail_whale_raul_orozco.gif" alt="art_jackson_fail_whale_raul_orozco" width="292" height="219" /></p>
<p>The breaking news of Michael Jackson’s sudden death nearly two weeks ago dramatically slowed the internet, crippled Google, crashed Twitter, sent iTunes and BitTorrent downloads skyrocketing and made for a huge portion of TV news and radio airplay, <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/michael-jackson-news-dominates-web-buzz/Michael%20Jackson%20News%20Dominates%20Web%20Buzz">according to </a> The Nielsen Company, Billboard and a number of other analysts that tracked coverage of the event.</p>
<p><strong>An Online Outpouring</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/25/the-web-collapses-under-the-weight-of-michael-jacksons-death/"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/25/the-web-collapses-under-the-weight-of-michael-jacksons-death/">Nielsen</a> reported that Jackson-related news dominated web discussion on June 25, causing huge spikes in traffic and overwhelming social networks with bursts of information and updates from millions of users.</p>
<p>In comparison, the high volume of blog discussions about Jackson made recent buzz around the swine flu scare and President Obama’s inauguration seem paltry and insignificant.<span id="more-631"></span></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-632" title="graph" src="http://www.digitallyapproved.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/graph-300x179.jpg" alt="graph" width="436" height="227" /></p>
<p>Similarly a Nielsen Buzzmetrics analysis revealed that more than 16% of tweets in the 24-hour period after Jackson’s death mentioned the singer, while less than 2% of mentioned Farrah Fawcett and Iran &#8211; two other high-profile news topics during the same time period.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-633" title="graph-twitter" src="http://www.digitallyapproved.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/graph-twitter-300x210.jpg" alt="graph-twitter" width="387" height="270" /></p>
<p><a href="http://mashable.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-twitter/">Information from Mashable</a> put the percentage of MJ-tribute tweets higher, at close to 30%, with a reported 50,000 tweets in just one hour. Mashable said that Twitter tracking tool Twist showed 22.61% of Tweets following Jackson’s death with the phrase “Michael Jackson,” 9% containing “MJ,” and 25% including the name “Michael.” Twitter is reported to have crashed at least once during this time.</p>
<p>The ICM News site in the UK <a href="http://news.icm.ac.uk/technology/google-twitter-crash-at-news-of-jackson%E2%80%99s-death/2322/">reported</a> that search engine Google dramatically slowed down between 2:40 pm and 3:15 pm Pacific time on June 25, as millions of Googlers entering the star’s name got an error page rather than a list of results. These difficulties were later confirmed by Google.</p>
<p>In addition, many entertainment sites slowed significantly and became difficult to access, including celebrity gossip site TMZ.com, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/25/the-web-collapses-under-the-weight-of-michael-jacksons-death/">according to</a> TechCrunch. TMZ.com first broke the story that Jackson’s heart had stopped and paramedics had been summoned.</p>
<p><strong>Traditional Media Also Overtaken</strong></p>
<p>Separate from web activity,  TV and radio stations immediately began airing footage and playing songs in the hours immediately following Jackson’s death.</p>
<p>US TV network and cable coverage seemed nearly omnipresent, while the Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jun/26/michael-jackson-tv-ratings">reported </a>that the UK’s Sky News reported a peak of 735,000 viewers in the 15 minutes after Jackson’s death was confirmed, while the BBC News channel hit 562,000 viewers around the same time period. The jump in viewers resulted in much-higher-than-usual ratings for these channels during the time of the Jackson coverage.</p>
<p><strong>Radio Honors Jackson’s Passing</strong></p>
<p>Rolling Stone <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/06/29/michael-jacksons-hits-post-huge-radio-numbers-nielsen-reports/">reported</a> that Jackson’s music became immediately popular on radio as well. Citing Nielsen numbers, the magazine said the singer’s biggest hits jumped nearly 1,735% in overall airplay over the previous week, with many stations exclusively dedicating their play lists to Jackson’s music the weekend after his death.</p>
<p>According to  Nielsen Broadcast Data Systems, which tracks total airplay for terrestrial, satellite and cable radio stations, Jackson’s “Billie Jean” was played the most over the airwaves, logging 4,540 plays from June 22nd to June 28th. Of those, 4,446 plays came after June 25th. In the previous week, “Billie Jean” only registered 318 plays total, according to Billboard.com.</p>
<p>Billboard noted that, overall, 20 Michael Jackson songs registered more than 1,000 plays last week following news of Jackson’s death. By comparison, only Jackson’s “Rock With You” managed to crack 500 plays the previous week. “Thriller,” which was only played twice on Tuesday, June 23rd by all stations combined, was aired 1,497 times on Friday, June 26th, and collected 3,570 plays for the week. Also cracking the 3,000 plays mark were Off the Wall’s “Rock With You” and “Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough.”</p>
<p>Four Jackson 5 songs managed to surpass the 1,000-play mark: “ABC,” “I Want You Back,” “I’ll Be There” and “Never Can Say Goodbye.”</p>
<p><strong>MP3 Downloads Surge</strong><br />
Rolling Stone <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2009/06/26/michael-jackson-catalog-sales-soar-on-itunes-amazon/">reported</a> that, following Jackson’s death, the top five albums on iTunes, and seven of the Top 10, were all Jackson releases, with The Essential Michael Jackson, Thriller and Off the Wall ranking as the top three.</p>
<p>Similarly, the Amazon MP3 store listed Jackson as the service’s top-selling artist of the day following his death, said Rolling Stone. Last.fm also documented a large increase in listeners to “The King of Pop” in the moments following his passing, with a peak of roughly 42,000 of his songs played on the service between 6 pm and 8 pm ET.</p>
<p>Downloads of Michael Jackson’s music <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/michael-jacksons-death-causes-surge-on-bittorrent-090626/">also caused a surge on BitTorrent</a>, where, immediately after his death, the three most active torrents in the music section on the largest torrent indexer, Mininova, were all compilations or discographies from MJ. On top was a torrent listing 30 Michael Jackson albums, The Jackson 5 and The Jacksons, totaling 1.94 GB of music.</p>
<p><strong>MJ Death Spawns Spam</strong></p>
<p>Despite an outpouring of shock, caring and sympathy from fans worldwide, all of the web’s Michael Jackson activity isn’t about the love. Computerworld <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9134895">reported</a> that an increase in Michael Jackson spam and malware is likely to sweep the internet in the wake of the entertainer’s death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/07/06/michael-jackson-death-completely-overwhelms-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, I Won’t Pay to Read Your Newspaper Online</title>
		<link>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/06/25/no-i-won%e2%80%99t-pay-to-read-your-newspaper-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/06/25/no-i-won%e2%80%99t-pay-to-read-your-newspaper-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christy Wise</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food For Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitallyapproved.com/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With print media on the verge of extinction, publishers are starting to get desperate. Recently the Wall Street Journal announced they would be moving forward with charging their readers to view news content, with other media sure to follow suit. I think that web users have made it pretty clear since the dawn of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-606" title="murdoch" src="http://www.digitallyapproved.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/murdoch.jpg" alt="murdoch" width="249" height="286" /></p>
<p>With print media on the verge of extinction, publishers are starting to get desperate. Recently the <a href="http://industry.bnet.com/media/10002160/media-roundup-wall-street-journal-to-use-micropayments-metro-to-sell-us-papers-and-more/">Wall Street Journal announced</a> they would be moving forward with charging their readers to view news content, with other media sure to follow suit. I think that web users have made it pretty clear since the dawn of the internet that they <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2002/03/51146">don&#8217;t want to pay</a> for anything – not music, not games, not sports, and definitely not news. Slate Magazine tried moving their online magazine to a paid subscription model. <a href="http://billbennettnz.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/paying-for-online-content/">The result?</a><span id="more-604"></span>Less than 5% of readers were willing to contribute – even to the most modest of fees. Publishers, much like the music industry need to find new ways to monetize their content without having to charge us for that actual content (you are selling ads aren’t you? And aren’t internet production costs cheaper than print?). Even if every newspaper in the world decided to start charging for their service and somehow managed to prevent anyone from finding away around it, it’s not as if I will suddenly be in the dark and unaware of what is going on around me. I wouldn’t wake up one morning not knowing what the date is, who our President is, or how the police chase ended up last night. The beauty of “news” is that it’s spread primarily through word-of-mouth. I don’t need the New York Times to tell me about what’s happening in Korea because I can simply get that information through online conversations – or even (gasp!) off-line conversations with friends or family (I do use the telephone). So yes, I understand, newspapers and magazines have a business to run, and how dare we internet users think for a second that we can just learn all about Brad and Angie’s latest adoption, or how the weather is going to look this weekend, without having to pay for it. Mainstream media needs to realize that it’s not a matter of whether or not internet users have to pay for online content – it’s entirely about not needing to pay for it. Don’t think of us as freeloaders who are picking the virtual pockets of Rupert Murdoch, think of us as comfortable with how things have been all this time. Maybe if you’d charged us all along no one would bat an eye – but it’s too late now. And last time I checked – the internet isn’t free. I pay nearly $40 a month to have it in my home (and I’m sure that price will continue to rise) – paying more to read about our struggling economy is ridiculous (not to mention ironic). To the publishing industry and mainstream media – don’t waste resources, time, and money you don’t have trying to wage this war, you will eventually lose. Start thinking about alternatives before it’s too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/06/25/no-i-won%e2%80%99t-pay-to-read-your-newspaper-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;It&#8217;s Pretty Hip To Be On The Internet Right Now&#8221; &#8211; Bill Gates</title>
		<link>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/06/15/its-pretty-hip-to-be-on-the-internet-right-now-bill-gates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/06/15/its-pretty-hip-to-be-on-the-internet-right-now-bill-gates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christy Wise</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Things We Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom brokaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitallyapproved.com/?p=581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flashback:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flashback:<br />
<object width="512" height="296" data="http://www.hulu.com/embed/BV_Mi__S3HrepdyafmX1uA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/BV_Mi__S3HrepdyafmX1uA" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitallyapproved.com/2009/06/15/its-pretty-hip-to-be-on-the-internet-right-now-bill-gates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

